- a post by Jeanna Mason Stay
One of my guilty
pleasures is watching reality cooking shows. Not that I ever cook much, but
it's really fun to watch other people cook.
Recently while
watching one on Netflix called Zumbo’s
Just Desserts (seriously), I found myself thinking, “They’re talking about
the lavender oil a lot. That means she added too much and it’s gonna taste
awful.” And sure enough, a few minutes later, the judges were telling her that
her cake tasted like potpourri.
I started paying more
attention, and I realized that reality cooking shows are a really great place
to see foreshadowing, clues, and misdirection in action. In any given episode, the filming and editing have already
provided almost every clue you need to figure out the end result of the
episode.*
These shows are also
great at emotional manipulation. It was obvious pretty quickly in Zumbo’s, for example, that there was one
particular character** who we were supposed to dislike. Everything this fellow
said felt egotistical and just slightly sexist. And no one else spoke that way—at
least not in the episode as it was edited. What is he like in real life? What
are any of them like in real life? No idea. But we knew who to root for and who
to dislike, just by their behaviors and speech. We didn’t have to be told.
Because of the editing,
every clip they include matters, and they’re supposed to sway our perceptions. Does
someone comment on how this weird flavor combination is definitely going to
work? That will be important later in the episode—it’s either going to come
back to bite them, or it’s going to turn out to have been absolutely brilliant.***
Which leads me to the
subject of misdirection. Because it would be boring if every clue told you
where to look. So they edit in specific comments and moments, but you don’t
know if they’re going to lead to a flop or a fly. That lavender oil bit could
have led to a fantastic success. What it couldn’t have led to? Nothing. Talking
about it has signaled that something important is going on.
When a reality cooking
show calls attention to a detail, that means it will matter. As an audience, we
may not know if it will matter for good or for ill, but it matters. And that’s the way our writing should be as well. The details that we focus on should tell
part of the story. The reader should be able to look back and say, “Oh, I
see now why that mattered.”
It’s like Chekhov’s
gun on the mantel. You can’t just put it there and then ignore it.
Analyzing the ways
that reality cooking shows manipulate the audience and misdirect/guide us has
been interesting to me, and I find myself actively trying to notice the clues
as I watch. So if you need an excuse to watch your favorite cooking show, here
you go.**** Call it research.
* In shows that record the whole season before the first episode
has aired, you can sometimes see the clues for the finale right from the beginning.
** I say “character” because, let’s be honest, “reality” tv isn’t
actually real. These are certainly characters or at least personas, not real
people.
*** I just wrote “absolutely brilliant.” This means I’ve been
watching The Great British Baking
Show.
**** One caveat: American reality cooking shows do it far more than
foreign. The Great British Baking
Show feels a bit less manipulative of our
emotions, although there are still plenty of clues to the results of each
individual challenge.
